Data leaks represent a unique and more subtle form of cyberthreats that come from the inside. Unplanned and often unnoticed, data leaks can skim underneath the noses of cybersecurity leaders and lay the groundwork for malicious threats.
Table of Contents
In essence, a data leak is the unintentional exposure of sensitive data to unauthorised environments. This can occur in many ways: system errors that leave vulnerabilities in a platform, weak cybersecurity infrastructure, or classic human error, such as sending emails to the wrong person.
Involving simple accidents—rather than a newsworthy, planned attack—data leaks can be overlooked by enterprises. However, the frequency and cost of data leaks is on the rise. Especially as companies struggle to match the pace of cybersecurity training with the rise of new technologies like AI and digital co-working platforms, 66% of leaders also expect to see a rise in the coming year.
Data leaks and breaches both involve the unwanted release of data from an organization. The ways in which these threats come about, however, give the two different meanings.
Data breaches, on one hand, start with malicious attacks. Whether this attack comes from a single hacker or a cybercriminal group, it entails an unauthorized party accessing data from within an organization. Cyber attackers also get to this data through a multitude of strategies—malware, phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities in the system. No matter the strategy, however, data breaches are intentional.
On the other hand, a data leak is more subtle and internal, due to negligence of a simple mistake. It’s what happens when someone unknowingly leaves a door open—like a file shared with the wrong team. While they might not make the news as often, leaks are both more frequent and easier to prevent.
Even though these threats start in different places, data leaks remain the leading cause of data breaches. In fact, “human error” contributed to 95% of data breaches in 2024.
Most data breaches don’t arise from high-level hacking, they’re often triggered by routine errors. Here’s where things tend to go wrong:
These causes are preventable with the right combination of tooling, cybersecurity training, and governance.
Under frameworks like the GDPR, organizations must report data leaks promptly and may be liable for:
In addition to compliance obligations, data leaks can have broader financial consequences depending on the type of data exposed, how long it remained accessible, and the scale of impact. Even unintentional incidents such as sending sensitive data to the wrong recipient or misconfigured cloud storage can carry long-term costs.
Proper documentation, rapid response, and data leakage prevention strategies help mitigate liability.
Data leaks don’t always look the same. They fall into distinct categories based on the kind of data exposed and how it's mishandled. Below are some of the most common types:
An effective data leakage protection strategy must blend technical controls with cultural awareness.
Key prevention steps include:
These actions significantly reduce the risk of accidental exposure.
Individuals and organizations can proactively scan for exposed data using:
Monitoring helps detect exposure before attackers do.
These cases showcase how data leaks begin—often quietly—and how they can evolve into more severe security incidents when exploited by malicious actors.
While cybercriminal groups are typically the ones to exploit data leaks, they’re not immune to data leaks themselves. For example, Trend Micro researchers identified that the cloud security threat TeamTNT had inadvertently leaked their own DockerHub credentials in 2022. Team TNT mistakenly ran their operations while still logged into their DockerHub—all while attempting to attack a fake cloud environment or “honeypot” set up by Trend Micro. Learn more here: https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/22/i/security-breaks-teamtnts-dockerhub-credentials-leak.html
While the discovery pertained to a criminal group, the core issue was a classic data leak: the unintentional exposure of secrets in a publicly accessible environment. These leaked credentials offered insight into TeamTNT’s tooling and opened opportunities for defenders to study and intercept operations.
Alibaba OSS, a cloud-based storage platform used by businesses and developers, accidentally set some of their OSS buckets to public access, opening the door for attackers to enter and access sensitive metadata. In this case, cybercriminals planted seemingly harmless malware images into buckets that let them mine cryptocurrency from these vulnerabilities—a technique called steganography. Learn more here: https://www.trendmicro.com/en/research/22/g/alibaba-oss-buckets-compromised-to-distribute-malicious-shell-sc.html
The leak, though non-malicious in origin, quickly became a tool for cybercriminals. Attackers used the open buckets to distribute malware and launch further campaigns. This demonstrates how simple misconfigurations can spiral into exploitation.
In another incident, developers unintentionally leaked API tokens and authentication credentials in GitHub Actions workflows. These secrets were stored in environment variables or hardcoded files, which were then committed to public repositories. Learn more here: https://www.trendmicro.com/en/research/22/g/unpacking-cloud-based-cryptocurrency-miners-that-abuse-github-ac.html
Attackers scanned GitHub for exposed credentials and used them to inject malicious jobs into the automation workflows—resulting in unauthorized cryptocurrency mining. The leak didn’t require malware to occur; it simply relied on visibility and inattention.
Data loss prevention (DLP) is one of the most practical defenses against unintentional data exposure. Rather than serving as a catch-all cybersecurity framework, DLP is a purpose-built strategy to detect and stop data from leaking beyond controlled environments—whether that’s through email, cloud storage, or endpoints.
Set by security teams, DLP policies act as guardrails: flagging risky behaviour, monitoring sensitive data in motion, and preventing unauthorized transfers. When a DLP tool catches a potential data leak forming, it will notify security teams and help assess the severity of the case.
Enterprise-grade DLP solutions, such as data loss prevention software, provide visibility and enforce protective controls without disrupting legitimate workflows, helping organizations reduce accidental and negligent leaks before they escalate.
It’s not just about protecting data—it’s about managing who can see it. Zero Trust Secure Access (ZTSA) operates on the rule of “never trust, always verify.” That means access is granted based on real-time context—not just someone’s IP address. ZTSA complements DLP by enforcing adaptive access policies to ensure only trusted users and devices can access sensitive resources, even before a DLP rule is triggered. Together, they build a layered defence that stops both mistakes and misuse. Trend Vision One™ Zero Trust Secure Access (ZTSA) enforces identity, device, and risk-based access so access decisions adapt in real time, proactively to user behavior and security posture—backing up your DLP policies with smart, identity-based protection. For hybrid workforces, it’s an essential piece of the puzzle.