An Insider Threat is a security risk that originates from within your organization — typically involving an employee, contractor, or trusted partner who misuses their access to cause harm, whether intentionally or unintentionally.
Table of Contents
While most cybersecurity defenses focus on keeping threats out, insider threats emerge from within — quietly and often without immediate signs. These threats involve individuals who already have legitimate access to an organization's systems, data, or facilities, making them uniquely positioned to cause harm, whether intentionally or by accident.
Insider threats are especially dangerous because they operate under a layer of trust. Unlike external hackers who must penetrate firewalls and intrusion detection systems, insiders can navigate internal networks undetected — often using tools and permissions granted as part of their daily roles.
In many organizations, especially those operating hybrid work models or complex digital infrastructures, visibility into internal user activity is limited. This lack of visibility creates a blind spot where insider threats can flourish, exposing critical systems and sensitive information to misuse.
The challenge isn’t only technical — it’s also cultural. Companies must foster a workplace environment that encourages accountability, vigilance, and cybersecurity awareness at every level. Without this, even well-meaning employees can become unintentional risks.
Insiders can include:
Current employees (IT, HR, Finance, etc.)
Former employees with lingering access
Third-party contractors
Business partners or vendors
Interns or temporary staff
They can assume various forms based on the motive, privileges, and activities of the person. Knowing these forms is essential in identifying as well as countering probable threats even as they arise.
They are insiders who deliberately try to harm the organization. Their reasons can be revenge, ideology, personal gain, or working for a rival. Such harmful insiders usually also know how to go unnoticed, so their threat is even bigger.
They may have the capacity to pilfer secretive information, forge records, disrupt business, or implant malware. In other cases, they might even relax for months before attacking, maintaining access for an extended period of time.
Negligent insiders are well-meaning employees or contractors who unintentionally violate security. This might involve accidentally clicking on phishing messages, selecting bad passwords, mishandling sensitive data, or disregarding security controls.
Most insider attacks are due to negligence, most of the time due to unfamiliarity or an absence of training, rather than ill motives. Unfortunately, the effect can be just as significant as that of planned attacks.
A compromised insider is where an external party steals or assumes an otherwise legitimate user’s credentials, most commonly through phishing, malware, or social engineering. The external party proceeds to access internal resources as a trusted user.
This is an extremely difficult threat type to detect, as use appears to originate from an authorized source. Advanced behavioral analytics are often needed to detect anomalies within use patterns.
Collusion is the situation where an insider is working together with an outsider or criminal group. This threat is normally motivated by financial gain or blackmail and combines insider intelligence and external resources. Collusive threats are most troublesome because they put insiders' extensive access together with outsiders' skill and resources — resulting in very targeted and destructive attacks.
Insiders have legitimate access. They know the systems, policies, and weaknesses — making them hard to detect.
According to the 2023 Ponemon Institute Report, the average cost of an insider threat is £9.4 million per incident in the UK, with over 63% caused by negligence.
Type
Impact
Example
Negligent Insider
£9.4M average loss
Employee shares sensitive file over public cloud
Malicious Insider
IP Theft, Fines
Engineer steals source code before quitting
Compromised Insider
Ransomware deployment
Phishing victim gives access to attacker
Several high-profile cases out of the United Kingdom show just what type of damage insider threats can inflict across industries:
An employee had allegedly stolen and broken ancient artifacts from the museum. Employees had exploited their respected position and powers gradually, identifying points of weakness for interior access and stock audits.
An ex-British Army soldier employed insider understanding of prison regimes and prison processes within Wandsworth Prison to break free from prison custody. It poses the threat that is introduced by those who have institutional access as well as specialized training.
NCSC also noted insider threats as security threats to critical infrastructure of United Kingdom. In one scenario, the former contractor of an energy company attempted to disrupt business processes after failing to be effectively offboarded — underscoring the importance of proper access management once an employee exits.
Insider threats can be difficult to detect precisely because they come from trusted users. But even subtle changes in behavior or system usage can signal a deeper issue.
Unexpected access to sensitive systems — especially outside normal hours — is often one of the first clues. Employees accessing data unrelated to their role or transferring large amounts of information to external drives or cloud storage may be preparing for data theft, either intentionally or unknowingly.
Other signs include disabling security tools, repeatedly breaking policy, or displaying unusual behavior, especially after negative workplace events like a demotion or notice of resignation. In some cases, insiders may request elevated access without a valid reason or try to enter restricted areas.
Recognizing these patterns early, especially when supported by behavioral analytics, is key to detecting insider threats before they cause lasting harm.
To minimize insider threats, start by granting access to the absolute minimum. This is the least-privilege approach that allows for minimal exposure, and there also are products like User Behavior Analytics (UEBA) and Privileged Access Management (PAM) that can effectively catch misuse virtually immediately on a real-time basis.
Proper off-boarding is essential — access needs to be disabled the moment an employee departs the organization. Attacks most commonly take place after the easy step is omitted.
Training of employees is also required on a continued basis. Employees who have been trained in the nature of insider threats and what they must look out for can also become an extension of the defense. Work environments that encourage openness and responsibility also encourage reporting suspicious behavior earlier.
And, lastly, by incorporating monitoring technology like SIEM along with behavioral insights, organizations gain the insights they need to respond immediately and thwart threats.
Understanding insider threats is just the beginning — protecting against them requires the right technology. Trend Vision One™ gives you the visibility and analytics needed to detect risky user behavior before it leads to damage.
By correlating activity across endpoints, cloud, email, and identity layers, Trend Vision One helps uncover insider risks that traditional tools miss. Whether the threat is negligent, malicious, or compromised, you get the insights to respond fast and effectively.
As insider threats grow more complex, Trend Vision One empowers your team with the intelligence and automation to stay ahead.
Through the inclusion of analytics technology, behavior observation, as well as staff training to recognize suspicious behavior.
Malicious, negligent, compromised, and collusive
Limit access, monitor activity, train employees, and enforce security policies.