{"id":712,"date":"2013-07-30T04:30:10","date_gmt":"2013-07-30T12:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/internetsafety.trendmicro.com\/?p=712"},"modified":"2013-07-29T19:25:02","modified_gmt":"2013-07-30T03:25:02","slug":"why-the-uk-online-content-ban-will-hurt-not-help-our-kids","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.trendmicro.com\/internet-safety\/blog\/why-the-uk-online-content-ban-will-hurt-not-help-our-kids\/","title":{"rendered":"Why the UK Online Content Ban Will Hurt not Help Our Kids"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0By Lynette Owens<\/p>\n

On Monday, July 22, British Prime Minister David Cameron gave a speech<\/a> strongly urging ISPs, search engines, and mobile operators to block consumers from accessing online content, namely pornography.\u00a0 The motivation for the speech was a belief that this content is harmful to the well-being of children, so the technology industry should fix this.<\/p>\n

The speech stopped short of calling for censorship, suggesting that consumers of age could opt-in to get access to pornography if they so wished.\u00a0 But the speech also carried a strong threat of legislation if the parties held accountable did not fall in line.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s hard to disagree with wanting good things for our children.\u00a0 But it\u2019s dangerous and, ironically, immoral to use them as a means to make a lot of noise and get credit for actions that do not fully solve the problem and creates new ones in the process.<\/p>\n

Criticism of the speech has come in many forms.\u00a0 Here is ours.<\/p>\n

It Wrongly Assumes Technology is the Answer<\/span><\/p>\n

The goal\u00a0of the UK ban\u00a0is to shield children from online pornography and to stop all people from accessing content that contains both child sexual abuse images and pornography depicting rape.<\/p>\n

Such images are worthy of eliminating entirely from the Internet.\u00a0 Many industries and organizations, from technology to financial to non-profits, including ours, have already done, and continue to do, numerous things to stop the distribution of child sexual abuse images. \u00a0In our case, we work closely with both the Internet Watch Foundation<\/a> (IWF) and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children<\/a> (NCMEC) to ensure our products are blocking access to child sexual abuse images.<\/p>\n

But even those measures are not fool-proof.\u00a0 The IWF and NCMEC will tell you that even with the help of law enforcement agencies, we are all still reacting (albeit as quickly as possible) versus preventing such images from getting online.\u00a0 The images are being taken in places we don\u2019t know about.\u00a0 While those of us in the tech industry can always do more to help this issue, it ultimately cannot be 100 percent effective since the root cause of the problem is the creation of the images in the first place.\u00a0 This is something the tech industry can never solve.<\/p>\n

It Diminishes the Role of Parents<\/span><\/p>\n

In his speech, Mr. Cameron used the words \u201cfilter\u201d 29 times and \u201cblock\u201d 11 times.\u00a0 By contrast, he used the words \u201cteach\u201d and \u201ceducate\u201d only three times each.<\/p>\n

The speech, though not overt, was ultimately a broader call to clean up content on the Internet that is harmful to kids.\u00a0 The criticism many have already voiced is that there is no objective measure of what is or isn\u2019t okay for our kids to see.\u00a0 This is ultimately an individual family\u2019s decision, based on their own values and the particular needs of their children. \u00a0Mr. Cameron, however, argues that by forcing filtering in the home \u201cwe can protect all children, whether their parents are engaged in Internet safety or not.\u201d\u00a0 This is absolutely the wrong message to parents; it both dismisses the importance of their role and gives them license to be disengaged and\/or have a false sense their concerns will be handled by someone else.<\/p>\n

Anyone, whether a parent or not, knows the ultimate well-being of a child depends highly on their parents\u2019 engagement.\u00a0 My kids may see something that is harmful to them \u2013 however one defines \u201charmful\u201d, whether online, on TV or in real-life \u2013 but while I don\u2019t seek to deliberately expose them to this, it is inevitable.\u00a0\u00a0In April, my children saw news footage of the Boston Marathon bombings\u00a0airing on a television\u00a0in a restaurant where we dined. Instead of denying this upsetting reality, it is my job to talk to my children about it and assure them they are safe and have nothing to worry about.<\/p>\n

To assume that Internet filtering will eliminate the need for such conversations is a far cry from reality. \u00a0If the well-being of our children is the goal, then there should be greater emphasis and investment in encouraging parent involvement than on prosecuting search engines.<\/p>\n

It Does Not Address the Origin of Content<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Cameron\u2019s speech also overlooks two issues of the content that he is concerned about.<\/p>\n

In an age where social media and user-generated content comprise an enormous amount of the information we find online, some of the media that may be harmful to kids might be created by kids.\u00a0 While\u00a0the majority of\u00a0things on the Internet are\u00a0not harmless,\u00a0 there has been concern about teens sending inappropriate images of themselves to others (particularly through popular apps like Snapchat<\/a>, where images disappear after 10 seconds).\u00a0 Filtering or blocking does not ultimately solve the creation of such\u00a0images in the first place.\u00a0 Parent involvement, along with online safety and digital literacy education in schools are a better solution to this problem.<\/p>\n

Second, the Internet is not the only way kids might be exposed to age-inappropriate or harmful content.\u00a0 Mr. Cameron, where is your speech to the movie, television and video game industries?<\/p>\n

It Creates New Privacy and Security Issues<\/span><\/p>\n

Finally, in addition to falling short of being an effective solution, Mr. Cameron\u2019s proposal gives rise to new problems.<\/p>\n

First, it requires consumers to divulge personal information never previously required.\u00a0 Those of age who do not want to be blocked from accessing legal pornographic content must identify themselves.\u00a0 This alone has both angered and amused privacy advocates for its sheer audacity.\u00a0 This information would presumably be stored by individual ISPs and mobile operators, though it is not entirely clear who is responsible to collect, store and protect it.<\/p>\n

A second issue, which results from the first, is that such draconian measures may force people underground; it would encourage them to use proxy services in order to get around filters to access content that is already legal.\u00a0 It is our belief that this will consequently compromise the trust and safety on the Internet.\u00a0 For those of us whose life\u2019s work is to distinguish between the good and bad actors online, our job would become more difficult if these technical disguises were used by even those who are doing nothing wrong.<\/p>\n

This criticism is not a campaign against filtering.\u00a0 Online filters have their use and place.\u00a0 It is part of\u00a0our\u00a0on-going mission to educate everyone \u2013 from parents to schools to organizations to governments \u2013 that filtering in and of itself can never be the end.\u00a0 It should be one step in a series of many to ensure that all of us are heavily involved in helping the world\u2019s youngest citizens use the Internet in ways that help them succeed and contribute to society.\u00a0 Filters are designed to set and forget.\u00a0 That\u2019s the easy part.\u00a0 Raising a generation of good digital citizens?\u00a0 No one can do this alone.\u00a0 Not a single government, organization, school, or family, by threat or otherwise.<\/p>\n

Protecting our children online does not mean building higher walls around them.\u00a0 It means teaching them to protect themselves: to think critically about what they see and share, to understand how others\u2019 online actions can impact them and to be aware of how their own actions can impact themselves and others.\u00a0 It is not the easy path, but it\u2019s the only one worth taking.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Monday, July 22, British Prime Minister David Cameron gave a speech strongly urging ISPs, search engines, and mobile operators to block consumers from accessing online content, namely pornography. The motivation for the speech was a belief that this content is harmful to the well-being of children, so the technology industry should fix this.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s hard to disagree with wanting good things for our children. But it\u2019s dangerous and, ironically, immoral to use them as a means to make a lot of noise and get credit for actions that do not fully solve the problem and creates new ones in the process.<\/p>\n

Criticism of the speech has come in many forms. Here is ours.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4],"tags":[7,8,47,6,5,11,48,66,25,10,42,57,12,43],"class_list":["post-712","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-for-parents","category-for-teachers","tag-cyberbullying","tag-digital-citizenship","tag-digital-literacy","tag-education","tag-internet-safety","tag-kids","tag-media-literacy","tag-mobile","tag-online-privacy","tag-online-safety","tag-parental-controls","tag-parents","tag-social-networking","tag-website-filters","wpautop"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trendmicro.com\/internet-safety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/712","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trendmicro.com\/internet-safety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trendmicro.com\/internet-safety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trendmicro.com\/internet-safety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trendmicro.com\/internet-safety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=712"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.trendmicro.com\/internet-safety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/712\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trendmicro.com\/internet-safety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=712"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trendmicro.com\/internet-safety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=712"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trendmicro.com\/internet-safety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=712"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}